<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Framework for Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sniukas.com/2010/03/a-framework-for-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sniukas.com/2010/03/a-framework-for-innovation/</link>
	<description>Strategic Innovation for Growth and Renewal. Making Business Model Innovation happen.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Sniukas</title>
		<link>http://www.sniukas.com/2010/03/a-framework-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Sniukas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sniukas.com/?p=450#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Dear Peter,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks a lot for your comments. You&#039;re right, the framework was inspired by strategy frameworks. The original focused on strategic innovation as an outcome but people working with the framework found it could easily be extended.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We currently use it for working with a client for example who&#039;s goal is to invent 4 new business units, i.e. our input. So we set up a process which targets at developing and realising business model innovations as an output. And you&#039;re right, this is meant to be outside of standard business processes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Research (e.g. Birkinshaw) on management innovation has also proven that innovation starts with a problem that needs to be solved, which can also be an input.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All the best,&lt;br&gt;Marc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Peter,</p>
<p>thanks a lot for your comments. You&#39;re right, the framework was inspired by strategy frameworks. The original focused on strategic innovation as an outcome but people working with the framework found it could easily be extended.</p>
<p>We currently use it for working with a client for example who&#39;s goal is to invent 4 new business units, i.e. our input. So we set up a process which targets at developing and realising business model innovations as an output. And you&#39;re right, this is meant to be outside of standard business processes.</p>
<p>Research (e.g. Birkinshaw) on management innovation has also proven that innovation starts with a problem that needs to be solved, which can also be an input.</p>
<p>All the best,<br />Marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senator Tom Seymour: Education Review &#124; Educational Colorado</title>
		<link>http://www.sniukas.com/2010/03/a-framework-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Senator Tom Seymour: Education Review &#124; Educational Colorado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sniukas.com/?p=450#comment-144</guid>
		<description>[...] A Framework for Innovation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Framework for Innovation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Balbus</title>
		<link>http://www.sniukas.com/2010/03/a-framework-for-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Balbus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sniukas.com/?p=450#comment-143</guid>
		<description>This strikes me as more of a traditional framework for strategy formulation, not really breakthrough innovation.  True innovation doesn&#039;t generally follow from vision or purpose, unless the vision is to create something disruptive and the purpose is to achieve the vision - kind of a circular path.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Virtually all breakthrough innovation occurs outside of standard business processes - that&#039;s why so few organizations ever achieve it, and even less do so on a continuous basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This strikes me as more of a traditional framework for strategy formulation, not really breakthrough innovation.  True innovation doesn&#39;t generally follow from vision or purpose, unless the vision is to create something disruptive and the purpose is to achieve the vision &#8211; kind of a circular path.</p>
<p>Virtually all breakthrough innovation occurs outside of standard business processes &#8211; that&#39;s why so few organizations ever achieve it, and even less do so on a continuous basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

